NEW DELHI: In a classic case of witnesses turning hostile, 71 of the 87 witnesses reneged from their statement, including a young boy who in 2011 witnessed his father being hacked to death, paving the way for acquittal of accused with Supreme Court on Friday ruling that conviction could not be held only on the basis of testimony of the police.
Tired of too many ads?
Setting aside the high court's conviction order in the murder case, the apex court sympathised with HC judges and said "We quite understand the consternation of the learned judges, in the cold-blooded murder of a person, carried out in front of his own son where the investigation though elaborate, it collapsed miserably at the trial, where the prosecution witnesses; all of them, turned hostile".
"We share consternation of learned judges but that is no reason for us to rely on the story scripted by investigating agency based on so-called voluntary statements and recoveries made, which prosecution failed to prove to have a nexus with the crime," SC said.
"We cannot but observe that the judgment of the high court reversing the order of acquittal of the trial court proceeds on mere surmises and conjectures relying wholly on the testimony of the investigating officers, who merely regurgitated the statements recorded under Section 161 (statement before police) and the voluntary statements of the accused," the bench said.