'Valid, lawful exercise': What Centre told SC on Waqf row in 10 points

TOI News Desk / TIMESOFINDIA.COM / Updated: Apr 25, 2025, 17:44 IST

Text Size

Small
Medium
Large

The Centre defended the Waqf Amendment Act in the Supreme Court, asserting its alignment with established practices and valid legislative power. The government refuted claims of violating fundamental religious freedoms, emphasizing inclusiveness with non-Muslim representation in Waqf bodies.

'Valid, lawful exercise': What Centre told SC on Waqf row in 10 points

NEW DELHI: The Centre on Friday filed its response in the Supreme Court defending the Waqf Amendment Act, asserting that the legislation aligns with established practices and is a valid exercise of legislative power.
The government informed the Supreme Court that the petitions were based on an incorrect assumption that the amendments violate fundamental religious freedoms.
The Supreme Court had asked the Centre government to respond to the petitions within a week, whilst allowing petitioners to submit their rejoinder within five days thereafter.

Poll

Do you believe the Waqf Amendment Act aligns with religious freedoms?

No, it infringes on them.Yes, it protects religious freedoms.

Here's what the Centre told Supreme Court in 10 points:

The Centre said that the Waqf Amendment Act is a valid and lawful exercise of legislative power.
The affidavit said that the presumption of constitutionality applies to laws made by Parliament.
The Union government said there will be maximum of two non-Muslims among 22 members in the Waqf Council and Aukaf Boards, a measure that is representative of inclusiveness and not intrusive of the administration of Wakfs.
Parliament acted within its domain to ensure religious endowments like waqf are managed upholding trust reposed in it, Centre said in its affidavit.
The affidavit further said that blanket stay on several provisions of the act without being aware of adverse consequences were uncalled for when the presumption of validity there.
In the affidavit, the Centre told the top court that the pleas proceed on false premise that amendments take away fundamental rights of religious freedom.
The Centre told to apex court that pleas proceed on false premise that amendments take away fundamental rights of religious freedom.
Attempts of petitioners challenging validity of Waqf law against basic tenets of judicial review, Centre added.
The Centre said that there have been misuse of provisions to encroach private, government properties.
The government said that the amendments in the act were made after a comprehensive, in-depth, analytical study by a Joint parliamentary panel.

About the Author

TOI News Desk

The TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most."

End of Article