Zepto vs 'Mohammad Arshad's Zepto': Delhi HC rules in favour of ...

Kiranakart, parent company of Zepto, won a trademark dispute in Delhi High Court against Mohammad Arshad, whose "Zepto" trademark from 2014 remained unused. The court ruled in favor of Kiranakart, citing Arshad's lack of genuine commercial use, allowing the removal of his trademark registration. Zepto, active in quick commerce since 2021, has built significant market presence.
Zepto vs 'Mohammad Arshad's Zepto': Delhi HC rules in favour of ...
Kiranakart, the parent company of quick commerce giant Zepto, has won a nearly year-long trademark dispute in the Delhi High Court. As reported by Inc42, the Judge Amit Bansal ruled in favour of the four-year-old startup’s petition to cancel the trademark "Zepto," which had been registered by Mohammad Arshad on July 14, 2014. The Delhi High Court ordered its removal from the trademark register, siding with Zepto’s rectification plea.
In its ruling, the court said that Zepto had been consistently and extensively using the trademark in India since July 2021, building a strong reputation under its brand logo. In contrast, Arshad had not commercially utilised the trademark in the eight years since its registration. Judge Bansal reportedly noted, “The respondent no.1 (Arshad) has no bona fide intention to use the impugned mark for the services claimed in its registration. Despite nearly eight years passing since its entry on the Register of Trade Marks, respondent no.1 has failed to use it in relation to Class 35 services.” The court deemed Arshad’s trademark a mere obstruction on the register, lacking merit.

What Mohammad Arshad’s "Zepto" offered


Mohammad Arshad’s "Zepto" was registered under Trademark Classes 9 and 35, covering services like smartphone distribution, phone accessories, computer software, and telephone instruments, with a claimed usage dating back to April 1, 2011. However, Zepto argued that Arshad’s opposition to its own trademark application was a deliberate attempt to delay registration and harass the company. The startup further alleged dishonesty, pointing to Arshad’s July 2024 settlement offer, which Zepto rejected, suspecting it was an extortion attempt disguised as an amicable resolution.
Arshad neither responded to the petition nor appeared in court, leading to the uncontested approval of Kiranakart’s plea. Citing Section 47(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, the court explained that a trademark unused for five continuous years, up to three months before a rectification petition, is liable for removal. Arshad’s prolonged non-use met this criterion.
Zepto highlighted its scale to the court, noting it operates around 350 dark stores, employs over 1,000 professionals and 40,000 delivery executives, and serves more than 8 million customers across 10+ cities in India.
author
About the Author
TOI Tech Desk

The TOI Tech Desk is a dedicated team of journalists committed to delivering the latest and most relevant news from the world of technology to readers of The Times of India. TOI Tech Desk’s news coverage spans a wide spectrum across gadget launches, gadget reviews, trends, in-depth analysis, exclusive reports and breaking stories that impact technology and the digital universe. Be it how-tos or the latest happenings in AI, cybersecurity, personal gadgets, platforms like WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook and more; TOI Tech Desk brings the news with accuracy and authenticity.

End of Article

Latest Mobiles

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA