Nana Patekar gets relief as Court refused to act on Tanushree Dutta's 'Me Too' allegations on the actor - deets inside

A Mumbai court has dismissed the 'MeToo' allegations against Nana Patekar due to Tanushree Dutta filing the complaint beyond the period of limitation. The court found no substantial reason for the delay as the FIR was lodged in 2018 for an incident that allegedly took place in 2008.
Nana Patekar gets relief as Court refused to act on Tanushree Dutta's 'Me Too' allegations on the actor - deets inside
Tanushree Dutta had filed a complaint against Nana Patekar in October 2018 as she accused the actor of harassing and misbehaving with her on the sets of 'Horn Ok Pleasss'. This created a huge stir and started the whole 'Me Too' movement on social media. Later in 2019, the police filed the final report before the magistrate court stating that probe did not find anything incriminating against any of the accused. The FIR was found to be false, the police further said in its report. In legal terms, such a report is called a 'B-summary'.
Now, a Mumbai court has finally given its judgement on the matter. The court has refused to take cognisance of "MeToo" allegations against Nana. The reason given for this was that, Tanushree had filed the complaint, "beyond the period of limitation" and did not even explain the reason for the delay in complaint. The actress had filed the complaint in 2018 and had accused Nana of harassing her in 2008, with no specific reason in the delay for filing the complaint.
Thus, Judicial Magistrate First Class (Andheri) NV Bansal said that Dutta filed an FIR in 2018 over an incident that allegedly occurred on March 23, 2008. The magistrate said that Tanushree had filed an FIR in 2018 under the Indian Penal Code sections 354 and 509 over an incident that allegedly occurred on March 23, 2008. The magistrate added, "no reason before me to take cognisance after a long lapse of more than 7 years after the expiry of the period of limitation."
The magistrate also said, "If such a huge delay is condoned without any sufficient cause, then it will be against the principle of equity and true spirit of the law. Thus this is not within limitation and the court is barred to take cognisance of the same."
Thus, the magistrate disposed of the B Summary report, saying it "cannot be dealt with due to bar of taking cognisance".
Neither Tanushree, nor Nana have reacted after this decision by the court.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Women's Day wishes, messages and quotes !
author
About the Author
TOI Entertainment Desk

The TOI Entertainment Desk is a dynamic and dedicated team of journalists, working tirelessly to bring the pulse of the entertainment world straight to the readers of The Times of India. No red carpet goes unrolled, no stage goes dark - our team spans the globe, bringing you the latest scoops and insider insights from Bollywood to Hollywood, and every entertainment hotspot in between. We don't just report; we tell tales of stardom and stories untold. Whether it's the rise of a new sensation or the seasoned journey of an industry veteran, the TOI Entertainment Desk is your front-row seat to the fascinating narratives that shape the entertainment landscape. Beyond the breaking news, we present a celebration of culture. We explore the intersections of entertainment with society, politics, and everyday life.

End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Tired of too many ads?